Amitriptyline Withdrawal

Here is an interesting article on Amitriptyline withdrawal that I find helpful. I am helping a patient lower this medication and am surprised at how severe the withdrawal symptoms can be. The patient stopped taking Amitriptyline 5 mg abruptly, along with diazepam 2 mg, after taking it for two months. The withdrawal symptoms consisted of severe insomnia, anxiety, burning sensations, and depression. She had to restart her medications, this time her psychiatrist put her on Amitriptyline 25 mg and Escitalopram 5 mg.

It is possible to support the withdrawal process through both functional and energy medicine approaches, but this is one medication that may require both serotonin (using 5-HTP) as well as catecholamine support (using DL-phenylalanine) in order to come off of it gradually. Do not underestimate the withdrawal problems associated with Amitriptyline!

Share

Being obsessed with being productive ... is unproductive by Steven Johnson

Here’s a helpful article by Steven Johnson about productivity that gives people permission to relax. The sympathetic nervous system, which creates the “fight or flight” response is almost always too active while the parasympathetic nervous system is below normal. This imbalance ultimately creates health problems. I strongly advocate a shift in our attitudes towards achievement and productivity. Let’s not be slaves of social expectations, but rather, turn inward for greater acceptance and clarity about a balanced, grounded life.

Click here for the link to the article:

Being obsessed with being productive ... is unproductive

Share

Antipsychotic Use in Young People Tied to 80% Increased Risk of Death

Antipsychotic Use in Young People Tied to 80% Increased Risk of Death

Publish date: December 12, 2018

By Steve Cimino

Vitals

View on the News

RESULTS HEIGHTEN ‘ALREADY INCREASED CAUTION’

FROM JAMA PSYCHIATRY

Children and young people who received antipsychotic doses higher than 50-mg chlorpromazine equivalents had an 80% increased risk of death at follow-up, compared with a control group, according to a study of young Medicaid enrollees who recently had begun medication.

“The study findings seem to reinforce existing guidelines for improving the outcomes of antipsychotic therapy in children and youths,” wrote lead author Wayne A. Ray, PhD, of the department of health policy at the Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tenn., and his coauthors. Those guidelines include using “psychosocial interventions when possible, cardiometabolic assessment before treatment and monitoring after treatment, and limiting therapy to the lowest dose and shortest duration possible,” they wrote.

The study, published online in JAMA Psychiatry, analyzed children and young adults from Tennessee, aged 5-24 years, who were new medication users, and had been enrolled in Medicaid between 1999 and 2014.

They were split into three groups: a control group (189,361) with users primarily taking attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medications and antidepressants; a group (28,377) with users who received antipsychotic doses of 50 mg or less chlorpromazine equivalents; and a group (30,120) with users who received doses higher than 50-mg chlorpromazine equivalents.

At follow-up, the incidence of death in the higher-dose group was 146.2 per 100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 107.3-199.4 per 100,000 person-years), compared with 49.5 in the lower-dose group (95% CI, 24.8-99.0) and 54.5 in the control group (95% CI, 42.9-69.2). This difference was attributed to unexpected deaths, which accounted for 52.5% of deaths in the higher-dose group. No increased risk of death was noted for injuries or suicides. “The elevated risk persisted for unexpected deaths not due to overdose, with a 4.3-fold increased risk of death from cardiovascular or metabolic causes,” Dr. Ray and his coauthors wrote.

The authors shared potential limitations of their study, including a relatively small number of deaths during follow-up and subsequent statistical adjustment during analysis. They also recognized that their data did not factor in important characteristics such as body mass index and family history, and that a “single-state Medicaid cohort may limit the study’s generalizability.”

Nonetheless, they emphasized Medicaid’s relevance as coverage provider for an estimated 39% of U.S. children, along with noting that this was a first step toward better understanding the consequences of prescribing antipsychotics in younger populations.

“Further studies are needed that compare antipsychotic users and controls within more narrow comorbidity ranges or in analyses that include richer clinical data,” they wrote.

The study was supported by grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and the National Institute for Child Health and Human Development. No conflicts of interest were reported.

SOURCE: Ray WA et al. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 12. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3421.

Share

What These Medical Journals Don’t Reveal: Top Doctors’ Ties to Industry

Conflict of Interest in Medical Research and Journal Articles

Here is a recent article in the New York Times on the conflict of interest between researchers and their published findings: their failure to be transparent about receiving substantial funding from pharmaceutical companies. Basically, many research findings are paid advertising from pharmaceutical companies, and the “prestigious journals” are the advertisers delivery platform, which is also funded by pharmaceutical companies.

Today, in the New York Times, the article states, “Calls for transparency stem from concerns that researchers’ ties to the health and drug industries increase the odds they will, consciously or not, skew results to favor the companies with whom they do business. Studies have found that industry-sponsored research tends to be more positive than research financed by other sources.” (December 8, 2018)

From my perspective, money from pharmaceutical companies sustains the medical field. This money is more than frequent incidents of bribery; it pays for the essential functioning of the medical system, from medical training to its publications. Medicine would not survive without its symbiotic partner: the pharmaceutical company. In fact, the parasite that initially climbed onto medicine’s back has so overwhelmed its host, that it now controls its functioning.

It is no wonder that the medical field chooses pharmaceutical approaches to nearly every chronic illness and has conflicts with those choosing natural, holistic interventions that allow patients to truly heal. Conventional medicine’s conflict with integrative medicine stems from its conflict of interest: being paid by the pharmaceutical companies.

Share

Alternative Medical Information on Vaccines

Thought I would share a few interesting articles on vaccines as we approach winter and the pressure to choose whether to receive the flu vaccine.

Vaccine Adjuvants and Excipients

What Doctors Don't Tell You: Scientists Discover Why the Annual Flu Jab Doesn't Work

The information being provided helps to clarify some questions that people may have about the effectiveness of the flu vaccine as well as some known health risks associated with routine vaccinations.  

Natural alternatives to the vaccine may be increasing vitamin C and zinc supplement intake, using homeopathic oscillococcinum pellets when symptoms first arise, Thieves lozenges (by Young Living Essential Oils), and Silver Solution (Smart Silver Solution by Deseret Biologicals).  And, of course, try to keep your stress levels down with meditation (Energy Breaths). I have tried this approach myself and have been free from colds and flus for years.  

I hope this information is helpful to you.

Alice W. Lee, MD

Share